Showing 1 - 10 of 12
Tax schemes are more restricted by constitutional rules than subsidies. We introduce a model of public good provision with incentive problems in agenda-setting and identify several advantages of restrictions on tax schemes. In particular, tax rules may prevent the proposal and adoption of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010998944
In this paper we examine the strategic implications of collective acquisition of information in a committee or in a legislature. We show that the prospect of acquiring information can harm a majority even if information is only available by the support of a majority. Moreover, the model provides...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005369349
We provide a simple justification as to why the core principal in liberal democracies the one-person-one-vote is desirable. We compare two possible constitutions. In a “fixed democracy”, each individual has one vote and the same opportunity to propose public projects. In a “flexible...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005369353
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005369514
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005147225
We examine the value of public information when a society uses a social choice rule to decide among a set of outcomes. We require that a social choice function satisfies unrestricted domain, non-decisiveness and the Pareto principle. We show that there exist payoff structures for every social...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005147237
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008537614
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005752879
We examine the division of resources among individuals by flexible majority rules where the majority necessary to adopt a proposal depends on the proposal itself. For instance, the size of the majority may increase with the maximal difference between the shares individuals receive. For large...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005752996
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005596370