Narrow search
Showing 1 - 10 of 33
Cover Image
The judicial signaling game : how judges shape their dockets
Jacobi, Tonja - In: Supreme Court economic review 16 (2008), pp. 1-38
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003757991
Cover Image
When should a case be dismissed? : the economics of pleading and summary judgment standards
Hylton, Keith N. - In: Supreme Court economic review 16 (2008), pp. 39-66
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003757992
Cover Image
The Condorcet case for supermajority rules
McGinnis, John O.; Rappaport, Michael - In: Supreme Court economic review 16 (2008), pp. 67-115
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003757994
Cover Image
Adam Smith, collusion and "right" at the Supreme Court
Levy, David M.; Peart, Sandra - In: Supreme Court economic review 16 (2008), pp. 159-163
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003758014
Cover Image
Judicial hierarchies and the rule-individual tradeoff
Mialon, Hugo M.; Rubin, Paul H.; Schrag, Joel L. - In: Supreme Court economic review 15 (2007), pp. 3-20
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003494822
Cover Image
Identifying the virtues of the common law
Cross, Frank B. - In: Supreme Court economic review 15 (2007), pp. 21-59
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003494826
Cover Image
Soft regulators, tough judges
De Geest, Gerrit; Dari Mattiacci, Giuseppe - In: Supreme Court economic review 15 (2007), pp. 119-140
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003494866
Cover Image
Keeping stigma out of administrative law : an explanation of consistent beliefs
Galbiati, Roberto; Garoupa, Nuno - In: Supreme Court economic review 15 (2007), pp. 273-283
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003494973
Cover Image
Stability and change in international customary law
Fon, Vincy; Parisi, Francesco - In: Supreme Court economic review 17 (2009), pp. 279-309
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003925390
Cover Image
Market share liability in personal injury and public nuisance litigation : an economic analysis
Priest, George L. - In: Supreme Court economic review 18 (2010), pp. 109-133
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009373673