Similar Search Results

Narrow search

Assessing conservation payments: Least-cost, least-rates, or most-value?

Hobbs, Benjamin F.; Nelson, Sushil K. - In: The Electricity Journal 2 (1989) 6, pp. 28-39

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005244687

Installed Capacity Requirements and Price Caps: Oil on the Water, or Fuel on the Fire?

Hobbs, Benjamin F.; Iñón, Javier; Stoft, Steven E. - In: The Electricity Journal 14 (2001) 6, pp. 23-34

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005244710

The generalized "most-value" criterion: "Least-cost" is still not "most-value"

Hobbs, Benjamin F. - In: The Electricity Journal 2 (1989) 10, pp. 52-55

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005244746

Environmental adders and emissions trading: Oil and water?

Hobbs, Benjamin F. - In: The Electricity Journal 5 (1992) 7, pp. 26-34

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005313661

What's flexibility worth? The enticing case of natural gas cofiring

Hobbs, Benjamin F.; Honious, Jeffrey C.; Bluestein, Joel - In: The Electricity Journal 5 (1992) 2, pp. 37-47

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005313727

When It Comes to Demand Response, Is FERC Its Own Worst Enemy?

Bushnell, James; Hobbs, Benjamin F.; Wolak, Frank A. - In: The Electricity Journal 22 (2009) 8, pp. 9-18

There is a significant risk of creating conditions that will crowd out true price response by focusing too much on demand response programs with unverifiable baselines and reliability-based rather than price-based mechanisms for obtaining consumption reductions.

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008521255

Where the Champsaur Commission Has Got It Wrong

Crampes, Claude; Glachant, Jean-Michel; von … - In: The Electricity Journal 22 (2010) 7, pp. 81-86

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005023091