Showing 1 - 7 of 7
Economic analysis of competition regulation is most developed in the domain of horizontal mergers, and modern agency … standard models, and more broadly to diverge with how economic analysis of proposed mergers should be and often is conducted …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012428221
Horizontal shareholding exists when significant shareholders have stock in horizontal competitors. (It is often imprecisely called "common shareholding," but that term can also apply when shareholders own stock in two noncompeting corporations. It differs from "cross-shareholding," which...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011685455
what otherwise seem like non-horizontal mergers should often be treated as horizontal. Those implications for traditional …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011972909
This Article shows that new economic proofs and empirical evidence provide powerful confirmation that, even when horizontal shareholders individually have minority stakes, horizontal shareholding in concentrated markets often has anticompetitive effects. The new economic proofs show that,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011810808
The prohibition against price fixing is competition law’s most important and least controversial provision. Yet there is far less consensus than meets the eye on what constitutes price fixing, and prevalent understandings cannot be reconciled with principles of oligopoly theory. This article...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011810824
When firms collude and charge supra-competitive prices, consumers can bring antitrust lawsuits against the firms. When the litigation cost is low, firms accept the cost as just another cost of doing business, whereas when the cost is high, the firms lower the price to deter litigation. Class...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012120107