Showing 1 - 10 of 13
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003831934
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009712792
The use of coarse categories is prevalent in various situations and has been linked to biased economic outcomes, ranging from discrimination against minorities to empirical anomalies in financial markets. In this paper we study economic rationales for categorizing coarsely. We think of the way...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010353550
We study both theoretically and experimentally the set of Nash equilibria of a classical one-dimensional election game with two candidates. These candidates are interested in power and ideology, but their weights on these two motives are not necessarily identical. Apart from obtaining the well...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010198494
We study both theoretically and experimentally the complete set of Nash equilibria of a classical one-dimensional, majority rule election game with two candidates, who might be interested in power as well as in ideology, but not necessarily in the same way. Apart from obtaining the well known...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009271606
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002846260
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013166983
Players may categorize the strategies available to them. In many games there are different ways to categorize one's strategies (different frames) and which ones players use has implications for the outcomes realized. This paper proposes a model of agents who learn which frames to use through...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012608716
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012606721
Brenner and Vriend (2006) argued (experimentally and theoretically) that one should not expect proposers in ultimatum games to learn to converge to the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium offer, as finding the optimal offer is a hard learning problem for (boundedly-rational) proposers. In this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012501306