Showing 1 - 5 of 5
This paper provides experimental evidence showing that members of a majority group systematically shift punishment on innocent members of an ethnic minority. We develop a new incentivized task, the Punishing the Scapegoat Game, to measure how injustice affecting a member of one’s own group...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013218242
We study collective action under adverse incentives: each member of the group has a given budget ('use-it-or-lose-it') that is his private information and that can be used for contributions to make the group win a prize and for internal fights about this very prize. Even in the face of such...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013215087
I analyse a group contest in which groups decide over two dimensions of membership-exclusivity: whether a member is allowed to join the group at all, and whether this member is allowed to join another group as well. If the prize is mostly private, group leaders do not offer membership in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013323852
How is group conflict over a public-good prize affected when individuals are active members of multiple groups simultaneously? To investigate this question, I introduce a simple model of Tullock group contest: individuals are partitioned into two groups in two dimensions each, the group-level...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012848396
The study analyzes and predicts how individual preferences and majoritarian political decisions about the extent of paternalism in a society depend on the distribution of genuine preferences for economic activities, the distribution of information about these preferences, and the distribution of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014254708