Showing 1 - 10 of 89
The usually assumed two categories of costs involved in climate change policy analysis, namely abatement and damage costs, hide the presence of a third category, namely adaptation costs. This dodges the determination of an appropriate level for them. Including adaptation costs explicitly in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008823912
The Stern/Nordhaus controversy has polarized the widely disparate beliefs about what to do in order to tackle the climate challenge. To explain differences in results and policy recommendations, comments following the publication of the Stern Review have mainly focused on the role played by the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009628143
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003363149
This paper examines stability of international climate agreements for carbon abatement under an optimal transfer rule and renegotiations. The optimal transfer rule suggested to stabilise international environmental agreements (Weikard 2005, Carraro, Eyckmans and Finus 2006) is no longer optimal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003715099
Cost-benefit analyses require comparing costs and benefits that occur at different points in time. Doing so, however, creates conflicts between short-term considerations a discounting scheme has to be consistent with observed behaviours and long-term ethical issues a discounting scheme must not...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003715368
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003356295
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003356439
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003356448
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003356540
International carbon offsets have been promoted since the Kyoto Protocol and an increasing number of countries have implemented or proposed cap-and-trade schemes with international trading, even though with quantitative or qualitative restrictions. Those limits reflect the trade-off between...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008702840