Similar Search Results

What can facilitate cooperation : fairness, ineaulity aversion, punishment, norms or trust?

Brandt, Urs Steiner - 2008

Almost all economic and public choice models assume that all people are exclusively pursuing their own material self-interests and do not care about "social" goals per se. Several (laboratory) experiments address the question of the general validity of this assumption. A consistent conclusion...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003821574

Do employees always reciprocate homebased working with commitment? : the role of blurring boundaries, trust and fairness

Lott, Yvonne - 2021

on whether granting employees to work from home is a business case increasing their organizational commitment. Analysis … with employees' higher organizational commitment. A closer look at the data, however, shows that this is less often the … evidence that perceived fairness in the exchange relation with supervisors is of particular importance for employees …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012627845

Incorporating fairness motives into the impulse balance equilibrium and quantal response equilibrium concepts : an application to 2x2 games

Tavoni, Alessandro - 2009

successful in terms of fit to the experimental data: EQRE, IBE, EIBE, QRE and Nash equilibrium. -- Fairness ; Inequity aversion …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008811006

On the stochasticity of ultimatum games

Qi, Tianxiao; Xu, Bin; Wu, Jinshan; Vriend, Nicolaas J. - 2021

Brenner and Vriend (2006) argued (experimentally and theoretically) that one should not expect proposers in ultimatum games to learn to converge to the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium offer, as finding the optimal offer is a hard learning problem for (boundedly-rational) proposers. In this...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012501306