Showing 1 - 10 of 27
Uncertainty plays a significant role in evaluating climate policy, and fattailed uncertainty may dominate policy advice. Should we make our utmost effort to prevent the arbitrarily large impacts of climate change under deep uncertainty? In order to answer to this question we propose an new way...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010392465
The literature of welfare-maximising greenhouse gas emission reduction strategies pays remarkably little attention to equity. This paper introduces three ways to consider efficiency and equity simultaneously. The first method, inspired by Kant and Rawls, maximises net present welfare, without...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011608505
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001537846
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001395949
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001648030
In September 2011, the US Environmental Protection Agency asked 12 economists how the benefits and costs of regulations should be discounted for projects that affect future generations. This paper summarizes the views of the panel on three topics: the use of the Ramsey formula as an organizing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013088713
Uncertainty plays a significant role in evaluating climate policy, and fattailed uncertainty may dominate policy advice. Should we make our utmost effort to prevent the arbitrarily large impacts of climate change under deep uncertainty? In order to answer to this question we propose an new way...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009271275
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003846334
I compare and contrast five climate scenarios: (1) no climate policy; (2) non-cooperative cost-benefit analysis (NC CBA); (3) NC CBA with international permit trade; (4) NC CBA with joint and several liability for climate change damages; and (5) NC CBA with liability proportional to a country's...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012733442
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000942704