Showing 1 - 10 of 34
-2000 sample, the initial response of investment to a productivity shock with responses in the top quartile is 60% higher than the … shock. Conversely, a slowdown after a boom can lead to a long lasting investment slump, which is unresponsive to policy … smoothing in the investment response to aggregate shocks. The remaining 40% is explained by general equilibrium forces. The …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014057432
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010236537
The sensitivity of U.S. aggregate investment to shocks is procyclical: the initial response increases by approximately … counterexample to the claim that microeconomic investment lumpiness is inconsequential for macroeconomic analysis …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012761267
The sensitivity of U.S. aggregate investment to shocks is procyclical: the initial response increases by approximately … counterexample to the claim that microeconomic investment lumpiness is inconsequential for macroeconomic analysis …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012466329
The sensitivity of U.S. aggregate investment to shocks is procyclical: the response upon impact increases by … a counterexample to the claim that microeconomic investment lumpiness is inconsequential for macroeconomic analysis …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014217331
holds for the microeconomic response of some of the most important economic variables, such as investment, labor demand, and … actual response to shocks is less than half as fast as the estimated response. For investment, labor demand and prices, the …, even after aggregating investment across all establishments in U.S. manufacturing, the estimate of its speed of adjustment …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011609531
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001784947
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001794023
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001796262
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002114575