Showing 1 - 10 of 76
This paper compares two contrasting approaches to robust monetary policy design. The first developed by Hansen and Sargent (2003, 2007) assumes unstructured model uncertainty and uses a minimax robustness criterion to design monetary rules. This contrasts with an older literature that structures...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011604945
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001144425
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003966470
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001495365
This paper compares two contrasting approaches to robust monetary policy design. The first developed by Hansen and Sargent (2003, 2007) assumes unstructured model uncertainty and uses a minimax robustness criterion to design monetary rules. This contrasts with an older literature that structures...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003778827
This paper compares two contrasting approaches to robust monetary policy design. The first developed by Hansen and Sargent (2003, 2007) assumes unstructured model uncertainty and uses a minimax robustness criterion to design monetary rules. This contrasts with an older literature that structures...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012772044
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000137107
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001132605
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013422104
We examine an interesting puzzle in monetary economics between what monetary authorities claim (namely to be forward-looking and pre-emptive) and the poor stabilization properties routinely reported for forecast-based rules. Our resolution is that central banks should be viewed as following...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011604689