Showing 1 - 10 of 64
We consider a dynamic screening model where the agent may go bankrupt due to, for example, cash constraints. We model bankruptcy as a verifiable event that occurs whenever the agent makes a per period loss. This leads to less stringent truth-telling constraints than those considered in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014476119
In a market environment with random detection of product quality, a firm can employ umbrella branding as a strategy to convince consumers of the high quality of its products. Alternatively, a firm can rely on external certification of the quality of one or both of its products. We characterize...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003730661
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003783122
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003784277
In a standard adverse selection world, asymmetric information about product quality leads to quality deterioration in the market. Suppose that a higher investment level makes the realization of high quality more likely. Then, if consumers observe the investment (but not the realization of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003833301
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003834328
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003419160
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003484057
The paper studies procurement contracts with pre-project investigations in the presence of adverse selection and moral hazard. To model the procurer's roblem, we extend a standard sequential screening model to endogenous information acquisition with moral hazard. The optimal contract displays...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003935679
Who does, and who should initiate costly certification by a third party under asymmetric quality information, the buyer or the seller? Our answer ' the seller ' follows from a non-trivial analysis revealing a clear intuition. Buyer-induced certification acts as an inspection device, whence...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003975228