Showing 1 - 10 of 1,257
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002556379
By vetoing one questions mutually efficient agreements. On the other hand the threat of vetoing may prevent exploitation. Based on a generalization of ultimatum bargaining (Suleiman, 1996) we first elicit the responders' certainty equivalents for three different degrees of veto power. Afterwards...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001490379
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001473760
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000828777
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000828778
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003974019
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003498130
A long time ago most economists would have limited themselves to stating that agreements should be individually rational and efficient and that selecting a specific agreement from that set depends on bargaining and negotiation power whatever that may be. Nowadays hardly any economist will argue...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008989998
Rational bargaining behavior depends crucially on the rules of bargaining, especially on whether parties decide sequentially or independently. Whereas in ultimatum bargaining the proposer can exploit the responder, independent commitments result in more balanced payoffs. To limit the scope of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009574886
The evolution of trustworthiness as a major aspect of business ethics depends crucially on whether it can be signaled. If this is impossible, only opportunistic traders will survive. Whereas previous studies have analysed detection agencies (Güth and Kliemt, 1994 and 1998) or have substituted...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009578022