Showing 1 - 10 of 97
Purpose – To test the effects of underpricing and share retention (i.e. the proportion of shares retained by the pre‐initial‐public‐offering (IPO) owners) on IPO aftermarket liquidity. Design/methodology/approach – Uses both percentage spread and turnover ratio to measure liquidity....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014785227
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003759278
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003523417
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003500002
We propose reduced investment as a potential explanation for why firms with internal control weakness (ICW) exhibit lower valuation relative to non-ICW firms. We show that ICW firms significantly reduce investment around ICW disclosure and also have poor stock performance. Additional evidence...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012892504
We examine why many firms disclose internal control weaknesses (ICW) under section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act after previously reporting effective internal control (IC). We find that about half of the cross-sectional ICW determinant variables either do not change significantly from Year T-1 to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012892508
We examine the decision to list in the U.S. markets by foreign firms through American Depository Receipts (ADRs). There is a high positive correlation between the valuation of existing ADRs and the number of new ADR listings next year. ADR listing is more likely when existing ADRs are valued...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012893652
We examine private issuance of public equity (PIPE) in China, and our results suggest that PIPE investors benefit from the price manipulation before and after issuance. These investors tend to cash out after lockup expiration and make large profits. We also find evidence that the trading of PIPE...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012862178
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012800627
We find that firms reporting internal control material weakness (ICW) under Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act have 13% lower valuation than non-ICW firms based on Tobin's q. This valuation difference is mainly driven by stock underperformance of more than 13% during the year before ICW...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013043723