Showing 1 - 5 of 5
We examine internal auditors' fraud risk decisions in response to variations in audit committee quality and management performance incentives. Using an experimental approach, we find that internal auditors serving in a either a self-assessment role or a due diligence role were sensitive to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009459068
Prior research has shown that when auditors are aware of overall risk information from procedures performed earlier in the audit, halo effects in subsequent judgments result (e.g., O'Donnell and Schultz 2005). The purpose of this study is to examine whether such effects occur in the context of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009459072
amongst the board of directors of an issuer for the purpose of overseeing the accounting and financial reporting processes of …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009459074
This descriptive study analyzes deficiency data disclosed in peer review reports of the AICPA's Center for Public Company Audit Firms Peer Review Program (CPCAF PRP). We analyze the reports of the largest 20 triennially inspected firms that have both a PCAOB inspection report and a CPCAF peer...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009459075
Internal audit quality is an issue of great importance to both the internal and external audit professions. PCAOB Auditing Standard No 2 highlights this importance when addressing the reliance that the external auditor can place on the internal audit work product. The study discussed here...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009459076