Showing 1 - 10 of 280
The best predictor of current investment at the firm level is lagged investment. This lagged-investment effect is empirically more important than the cash-flow and Q effects combined. We show that the specification of investment adjustment costs proposed by Christiano, Eichenbaum and Evans...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008925713
Which investment model best fits firm-level data? To answer this question we estimate alternative models using Compustat data. Surprisingly, the two best-performing specifications are based on Hayashi's (1982) model. This model's foremost implication, that Q is a sufficient statistic for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005791890
The best predictor of current investment at the firm level is lagged investment. This lagged-investment effect is empirically more important than the cash-flow and Q effects combined. We show that the specification of investment adjustment costs proposed by Christiano et al. (2005) predicts the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010868916
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009981011
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007984933
Which investment model best fits firm-level data? To answer this question we estimate alternative models using Compustat data. Surprisingly, the two best-performing specifications are based on Hayashi's (1982) model. This model's foremost implication, that Q is a sufficient statistic for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005580618
The best predictor of current investment at the firm level is lagged investment. This lagged-investment effect is empirically more important than the cash-flow and Q effects combined. We show that the specification of investment adjustment costs proposed by Christiano, Eichenbaum and Evans...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008871135
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008932586
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007503369
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007291062