Showing 1 - 10 of 259
We examine the risky choices of contestants in the popular TV game show "Deal or No Deal" and related classroom experiments. Contrary to the traditional view of expected utility theory, the choices can be explained in large part by previous outcomes experienced during the game. Risk aversion...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005761458
We examine the risky choices of contestants in the popular TV game show “Deal or No Deal” and related classroom experiments. Contrary to the traditional view of expected utility theory, the choices can be explained in large part by previous outcomes experienced during the game. Risk aversion...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005144515
We examine the risky choices of contestants in the popular TV game show “Deal or No Deal” and related classroom experiments. Contrary to the traditional view of expected utility theory, the choices can be explained in large part by previous outcomes experienced during the game. Risk aversion...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011257215
We examine the risky choices of contestants in the popular TV game show quot;Deal or No Dealquot; and related classroom experiments. Contrary to the traditional view of expected utility theory, the choices can be explained in large part by previous outcomes experienced during the game. Risk...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012755728
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007989927
We examine framing effects by analyzing how risky choice depends on the absolute and relative size of the amounts at stake, using an extensive sample of choices from ten different editions of the large-stake TV game show Deal or No Deal. Our analyses within and across the samples suggest that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012726514
We examine cooperative behavior when large sums of money are at stake, using data from the television game show <i>Golden Balls</i>. At the end of each episode, contestants play a variant on the classic prisoner's dilemma for large and widely ranging stakes averaging over $20,000. Cooperation is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010990533
This study conducts a classroom experiment and an online experiment to examine individual decision-making under risk. Like Levy and Levy (2002), the experiment uses pairs of mixed gambles with moderate probabilities to avoid the framing effect and certainty affect that may affect non-mixed...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012778758
The value premium substantially reduces for downside risk averse investors with a substantial fixed income exposure, such as insurance companies and pension funds. Growth stocks are attractive to these investors because they offer a good hedge against a bad bond performance. This result holds...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012710794
We study individual portfolio choice in a laboratory experiment and find strong evidence for heuristic behavior. The subjects tend to focus on the marginal distribution of an asset, while largely ignoring its diversification benefits. They follow a conditional 1/n diversification heuristic as...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012713910