Showing 1 - 10 of 38
In the literature on judgment aggregation, an important open question is how to measure the distance between any two judgment sets. This is relevant for issues of social choice: if two individuals hold different beliefs then we might want to find a compromise that lies somewhere between them. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010998953
Consider the following social choice problem. A group of individuals seek to classify the elements of X as belonging in one of two sets. The individuals may disagree as to how the elements of X should be classified, and so an aggregation rule is applied to determine a compromise outcome. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011011303
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008379180
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008762175
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009989565
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010091390
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010026487
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010896589
A general model of judgment aggregation is presented in which judgments on propositions are not binary but come in degrees. The primitives of the model are a set of propositions, an entailment relation, and a “triangular norm” which establishes a lower bound on the degree to which a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008534436
Imagine that everyone in a group chooses a real number and then these numbers are combined to produce a group number. Suppose that when everyone moves strictly closer to some individual’s number, the group number either stays where it is or moves closer to this number. We call this the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008534446