Showing 1 - 10 of 227
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005671987
The basic problem in poverty measurement is how to weigh the income of different groups. This is a normative problem on which people differ in opinion, and hence we should seek a way of dealing with the issue that takes into account this plurality. In the paper, we suggest an approach to poverty...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005672001
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005672024
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005672028
Rawls (1971,1993) suggests that interpersonal comparisons of well-being should be based on a primary goods index, but it is well-known that in general this approach is not compatible with the Pareto principle. This is the indexing impasse. Sen (1985,1991) argues that this is partly due to the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005672040
In the framework of ethical social choice theory, sustainability is justified by Efficiency and Equity as ethical axioms. These axioms correspond to the Suppes-Sen Grading principle. In technologies that are productive in a certain sense, the set of Suppes-Sen maximal utility paths is shown to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005672043
It has been argued that any plausible egalitarian theory should give asbolute priority to the worst off in a conflict with the best off in society. In this paper, we show that this framework is closely linked to the leximin approach, and on the basis of a condition named the conditional...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005672045
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005781247
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005783278
Over the years, egalitarian philosophers have made some challenging claims about the nature of egalitarianism. They have argued that the Rawlsian leximin principle is not an egalitarian idea; that egalitarian reasoning should make us reject the Pareto principle; that the numbers should not count...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005487118