Showing 1 - 10 of 193
We study fair and efficient tax-benefit schemes based on income and non-income factors under partial control. Partial control means that each factor is a specific mixture of unobserved ability (randomly drawn by nature) and effort (chosen by individuals who differ in tastes). Factors differ in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010957616
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010926236
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010927110
We argue that normative indices of multidimensional inequality do not only measure a distribution’s extent of inequity (i.e., the gaps between the better-off and the worse-off), but also its extent of inefficiency (i.e., the non-realized mutually beneficial exchanges of goods). We provide a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010927727
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005362110
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005362261
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005364704
<link rid="b12">Fleurbaey <i>et al.</i> (2003)</link> develop a bounded dominance test to make robust welfare comparisons, which is intermediate between <link rid="b10">Ebert's (1999)</link> cardinal dominance criterion-generalized Lorenz dominance applied to household incomes, divided and weighted by an equivalence scale-and <link rid="b2">Bourguignon's (1989)</link>...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005202012
Different social planners may have different opinions on the well-being of individuals under different social options (Roberts, 1980). If utilities are translation- or ratio-scale measurable, or if the social ranking might be incomplete, or if interplanner comparability is allowed; then there...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005155492
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007396821