Showing 1 - 10 of 27
Executive Stock Option Programs (SOPs) have become the dominantcompensation instrument for top-management in recent years. Theincentive effects of an SOP both with respect to corporateinvestment and financing decisions critically depend on the design of the SOP. A specific problem in designing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012741305
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007432076
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007602590
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007989326
Stock-option programs (SOPs) became the dominant compensation instrument for top management in the nineties. Usually, they are not dividend-protected, i.e., any dividend payout decreases the value of a manager's options. Empirical evidence shows that this results in a significant decrease in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005823348
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005102199
In an experiment, we model two stylized facts about capital budgeting practice, budgetary slack creation and delegation of decision-making authority. In our setting, under centralization, headquarters announces a budget, the division manager gives a cost report, and headquarters decides on the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010615514
Stock Option Programs (SOPs) have become the dominant compensation instrument for top-management in the nineties. Usually, they are not dividend protected, i.e. any dividend payout decreases the value of a manager's options. Empirical evidence shows that this results in a significant decrease in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012784274
This paper analyzes theoretically the effect of stock and stock options on the investment behavior of managers. Recent theoretical results state that stock options are an inefficient means of motivating managerial effort. But if the manager holds restricted stock and is allowed to invest his...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012739599
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006691028