Showing 1 - 10 of 3,193
Koopmans’s (Econometrica 28, 287–309) axiomatization of discounted utilitarianism is based on seemingly compelling conditions, yet this criterion leads to hard-to-justify outcomes. The present analysis considers a class of sustainable recursive social welfare functions within Koopmans’s...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005652215
When evaluating long-term policies, economists usually suggest to maximize the sum of discounted utilities. On the one hand, discounted utilitarianism was given a solid axiomatic foundation by Koopmans (Econometrica 1960). On the other hand, this criterion has questionable implications when...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005427533
Let there be a positive (exogenous)probability that, at each date, the human species will disappear. We postulate an Ethical Observer (EO) who maximizes intertemporal welfare under this uncertainty, with expected-utility preferences. Various social welfare criteria entail alternative von...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010547285
The discounted utilitarian criterion for infinite horizon social choice has been criticized for treating generations unequally. We propose an extended rank-discounted utilitarian (ERDU) criterion instead. The criterion amounts to discounted utilitarianism on non-decreasing streams, but it treats...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010576558
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008926340
Let there be a positive (exogenous) probability that, at each date, the human species will disappear. We postulate an Ethical Observer (EO) who maximizes intertemporal welfare under this uncertainty, with expected-utility preferences. Various social welfare criteria entail alternative von...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008620514
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010539228
is critical for understanding sustainability. The capability approaches of Sen and Nussbaum are compared but argued to be …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010812586
Underlying the paper's arguments is the proposition that current built environment policies are based on a particular rationality that fails to accommodate the value of keeping options open in the interest of future generations. This failure brings to the fore the question of what counts as a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005754313
Underlying the paper's arguments is the proposition that current built environment policies are based on a particular rationality that fails to accommodate the value of keeping options open in the interest of future generations. This failure brings to the fore the question of what counts as a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008563715