Showing 1 - 10 of 7,532
Two recently published studies argue that conventional parameterizations of cumulative prospect theory (CPT) fail to resolve the St. Petersburg Paradox. Yet as a descriptive theory CPT is not intended to account for the local representativeness effect, which is known to induce 'alternation bias'...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010954515
We report an experiment in which subjects are not indifferent between real-money lotteries implemented with randomization devices that are equivalent under the Reduction Axiom. Instead, choice behavior is consistent with subjective distortion of conditional probability, and this persists in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011041611
Conventional parameterizations of cumulative prospect theory do not explain the St. Petersburg paradox. To do so, the power coefficient of an individual's utility function must be lower than the power coefficient of an individual's probability weighting function.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005146533
According to the harmonic sequence paradox (Blavatskyy 2006), an expected utility decision maker's willingness-to-pay for a gamble whose expected payoffs evolve according to the harmonic series is finite if and only if his marginal utility of additional income becomes zero for rather low payoff...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009216280
According to the harmonic sequence paradox (Blavatskyy 2006), an expected utility decision maker's willingness to pay for a gamble whose expected payoffs evolve according to the harmonic series is finite if and only if his marginal utility of additional income becomes eventually zero. Since the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008562411
The disposition effect describes investors' common tendency of quitting a winning investment too soon and holding on to losing investments too long. Since Shefrin and Statman (1985), the two sides of the disposition effect, i.e. quot;selling winnersquot; and quot;holding losersquot;, have been...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012723640
In the emerging field of behavioral finance, including human behavior aspects and implications of cognitive phsychology and anthropology in decisions are considered. The formulated hypotheses were tested by way of 400 questionairres answered by students enrolled in MBA programs. The principal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012725841
Recent literature has advocated that risk-taking behavior is influenced by prior monetary gains and losses. On one hand, after perceiving monetary gains, people are willing to take more risk (house-money effect). Another stream of the literature, based on prospect theory and loss aversion,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012727066
We re-examine preference reversal data from previously published studies to (1) identify the effects of different incentive treatments and (2) determine the models that best explain data patterns across incentive treatments. Contrary to the quot;folk-wisdomquot; that incentives do not affect...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012727191
This experimental study, first, compares the individual valuations of two risk reduction mechanisms: self-insurance and self-protection. Second, it investigates these valuations when the loss amount is ambiguous, and compares these values with valuations when loss amounts are known. Results...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012728889