Showing 1 - 8 of 8
The Rubinstein alternating offers bargaining game is reconsidered under the assumption that each player is loss averse and the associated reference point is equal to the highest turned down offer of the opponent in the past. This makes the payoffs and therefore potential equilibrium strategies...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010875117
In this paper we study three different types of loss aversion equilibria in bimatrix games. Loss aversion equilibria are Nash equilibria of games where players are loss averse and where the reference points – points below which they consider payoffs to be losses – are endogenous to the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005209918
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009972395
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009825472
In this note we introduce a new axiom for bargaining solutions, named Proportional Concession Monotonicity (PCM), which imposes that no player benefits when all players collectively make proportional concessions with respect to their respective utopia values. We reconsider the leximin solution...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010572230
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008615297
We consider bargaining problems under the assumption that players are loss averse, i.e., experience disutility from obtaining an outcome lower than some reference point. We follow the approach of Shalev (2002) by imposing the self-supporting condition on an outcome: an outcome z in a bargaining...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008869070
This paper presents a general technique for comparing the concavity of different utility functions when probabilities need not be known. It generalizes: (a) Yaariʼs comparisons of risk aversion by not requiring identical beliefs; (b) Kreps and Porteusʼ information-timing preference by not...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011049720