Showing 1 - 10 of 83
We compare coordination success of individuals and teams in the minimum effort coordination game. The game is played by groups of either five individuals or five two-person teams with either fixed or random re-matching protocols. When groups are fixed, teams perform at least as well as...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011209141
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008440900
We explore gender differences in trust and trustworthiness between male and female individuals and groups consisting of two members of the same sex to understand if single sex groups behave differently from individuals of the same sex. We find some differences in the early rounds such as: (i)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010747607
We explore facets of conditional cooperation in a public goods game. First, we replicate the Fischbacher, Gächter and Fehr (2001) result that the majority of subjects in public goods experiments are conditional cooperators. Next, given that the majority of subjects in our study are conditional...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010629591
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008673758
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002809217
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001992910
We explore the role of cognitive dissonance in dictator and public goods games. Specifically, we motivate cognitive dissonance between one's perception of “fair treatment” and self-interested behaviour by having participants answer a question about fairness. Utilizing two manipulations...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010884167
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010953675
I study allocations and beliefs about allocations in taking and giving games. The allocations are not significantly different between the two games, providing evidence on the isomorphism (equivalence) of taking and giving. In both games, the passive players are pessimistic about (underestimate)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011220535