Showing 1 - 10 of 104
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005210459
We use Australian data to test the Conditional Capital Asset Pricing Model (Jagannathan and Wang, 1996). Our results are generally supportive: the model performs well compared with a number of competing asset pricing models. In contrast to the study by Jagannathan and Wang, however, we find that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005142398
Can Australian equity returns be modelled by 'home-grown' factors? We examine the indigenous capital asset pricing model, the indigenous Fama-French three-factor model, and extensions to the latter, and find them all wanting. We find evidence of domestic market segmentation in Australia. For the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005142419
Durand "et al." (2006a) argue that the Australian market is both internationally integrated and domestically segmented. They find that the US-based three-factor model captures returns of the largest stocks in Australia (evidence of international integration), but that it is unable to account for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005142455
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009210515
Pettengill, Sundaram, and Mathur (1995) respond to the prima facie failure of the standard CAPM and propose a conditional beta model by segmenting the market into two states – up markets (where the market excess return rm–rf is positive) and down markets (where rm–rf is negative). We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010868619
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008262015
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007767571
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007895145
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007609975