Showing 1 - 10 of 138
The exchange between Epstein (2010) and Klibanoff et al. (2012) identified a behavioral issue that sharply distinguishes between two classes of models of ambiguity sensitivity, exemplified by the Î±-MEU model and the smooth ambiguity model, respectively. The issue in question is whether a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011133039
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002558403
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002558406
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002558408
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002558410
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002562497
Extensive data has convincingly demonstrated that expected utility, the reigning economic theory of rational decision making, fails descriptively. This descriptive failure casts doubt on the validity of classical utility measurements. Prospect theory can better explain choice behaviour because...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009460071
This paper reports the findings of a meta-analysis of 37 papers with 75 results from ultimatum game experiments. We find that on average the proposer offers 40% of the pie to the responder. This share is smaller for larger pie sizes and larger when a strategy method is used or when subjects are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009460329
Proper scoring rules provide convenient and highly efficient tools for incentive-compatible elicitations of subjective beliefs. As traditionally used, however, they are valid only under expected value maximization. This paper shows how they can be generalized to modern ("non-expected utility")...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010970087
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007378813