Showing 1 - 4 of 4
This paper proves that there is a similar Uzawa (1961) steady-state growth theorem in a Malthusian model: If that model possesses steady-state growth, then technical change must be purely land-augmenting and cannot include labor augmentation.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011110926
The celebrated Uzawa(1961) theorem holds that,on the steady-growth path of neoclassical growth model,technological progress must be purely labor-augmenting rather than capital-augmenting,except the special case where the production function takes the form of Cobb-Douglas. With an augmented...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011111354
Taking into account the adjustment costs of investment, this paper proves that it is not the neoclassical growth model itself but the specific form of capital accumulation function that requires technical change to exclusively be Harrod neutral in steady state. Uzawa’s(1961)steady-state growth...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011111943
Since the publication of Uzawa(1961), it has been widely accepted that technical change must be purely labor-augmenting for a growth model to exhibit steady-state path. But in this paper, we argue that such a constraint is unnecessary. Further, our model shows that, as long as the sum of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011112616