Showing 1 - 10 of 56
This paper studies, theoretically and empirically, the role of overconfidence in political behavior. Our model of overconfidence in beliefs predicts that overconfidence leads to ideological extremeness, increased voter turnout, and stronger partisan identification. The model also makes nuanced...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011156808
This paper studies, theoretically and empirically, the role of overconfidence in political behavior. Our model of overconfidence in beliefs predicts that overconfidence leads to ideological extremeness, increased voter turnout, and increased strength of partisan identification. Moreover, the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011184252
We study a model of non-Bayesian updating for ambiguity averse agents, based on the Hypothesis Testing model of Ortoleva (2012). Agents have a set of priors that they update as follows. If all priors assign to new information a probability above a threshold, they update every prior using Bayes...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010942351
Many violations of the independence axiom of expected utility can be traced to subjects' attraction to risk‐free prospects. The key axiom in this paper, negative certainty independence ([Dillenberger, 2010]), formalizes this tendency. Our main result is a utility representation of all...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011235024
Bayes' rule has two well-known limitations: 1) it does not model the reaction to zero-probability events; 2) a sizable empirical evidence documents systematic violations of it. We characterize axiomatically an alternative updating rule, the Hypothesis Testing model. According to it, the agent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010815657
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008424766
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009997700
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010110074
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010035987
The goal of this paper is to model an agent who dislikes large choice sets because of the "cost of thinking" involved in choosing from them. We take as a primitive a preference relation over lotteries of menus and impose novel axioms that allow us to separately identify the genuine preference...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005789825