Showing 1 - 10 of 72
This paper evaluates the impact of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines on inter-judge sentencing disparity, which is defined as the differences in average nominal prison sentence lengths for comparable caseloads assigned to different judges. This disparity is measured as the dispersion of a random...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005435965
This paper evaluates the impact of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines on inter-judge sentencing disparity, which is defined as the differences in average nominal prison sentence lengths for comparable caseloads assigned to different judges. This disparity is measured as the dispersion of a random...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010928197
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006895005
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007376061
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007760987
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005709343
It is generally agreed that boards are endogenously determined institutions that serve both oversight and advisory roles in a firm. While the oversight role of boards has been extensively studied, relatively few studies have examined the advisory role of corporate boards. We examine the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005834352
Every year thousands of firms are engaged in research joint ventures (RJV), where all knowledge gained through R&D is shared among members. Most of the empirical literature assumes members are non-cooperative in the product market. But many RJV members are rivals leaving open the possibility...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008566241
With the dramatic increase in federal and state environmental regulation in the 1970s, the cost of compliance also rose. While compliance costs have been discussed elsewhere, the implications for the competitiveness of markets have been evaluated using case studies of specific law changes and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005809813
Reports about runaway jury awards have become so common that it is widely accepted that the U.S. jury system needs to be "fixed". Proposals to limit the right to a jury trial and increase judicial discretion over awards implicitly assume that judges decide cases differently than juries. We show...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005436386