Showing 1 - 10 of 30
Even when participants know very little about their environment, the market itself, by serving as a selection process of information, promotes an efficient aggregate outcome. To emphasize the role of the market and the importance of natural selection rather than the strategic actions of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011197164
We perform an asset market experiment in order to investigate whether overconfidence induces trading. We investigate three manifestations of overconfidence: calibration-based overconfidence, the better-than-average effect and illusion of control. Novelly, the measure employed for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008619425
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010690899
This paper examines the impact of conservative traders on market efficiency in an evolutionary model of a commodity futures market. This paper shows that the long-run market outcome is informationally efficient, as long as in every period there is a positive probability that entering traders are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010582580
This article begins by proposing a random taste parameterization of a quadratic extension of the PIGLOG demand system at the household level, which is consistent with exact aggregation. This variation in tastes is a random function of household characteristics. The econometric implication is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005238185
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005320041
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005320057
This paper develops a model to examine how mutual funds set fees charged to investors within a context of non-competitive market structure. The empirical evidence shows that the performance, age, size and cash ratio of the fund have statistically significant impacts on the mutual fund fees but,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005324246
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005160688
Recent research has proposed several ways in which overconfident traders can persist in competition with rational traders. This paper offers an additional reason: overconfident traders do better than purely rational traders at exploiting mispricing caused by liquidity or noise traders. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005042693