Showing 1 - 10 of 473
There is abundant evidence that many individuals violate the rationality assumptions routinely made in economics. However, powerful evidence also indicates that violations of individual rationality do not necessarily refute the aggregate predictions of standard economic models that assume full...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012727385
Economists long considered money illusion to be largely irrelevant. Here we show, however, that money illusion has powerful effects on equilibrium selection. If we represent payoffs in nominal terms, choices converge to the Pareto inefficient equilibrium; however, if we lift the veil of money by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012712069
Much evidence suggests that people are heterogeneous with regard to their abilities to make rational, forward-looking decisions. This raises the question as to when the rational types are decisive for aggregate outcomes and when the boundedly rational types shape aggregate results. We examine...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005238914
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005359181
Much evidence suggests that people are heterogeneous with regard to their abilities to make rational, forward-looking decisions. This raises the question as to when the rational types are decisive for aggregate outcomes and when the boundedly rational types shape aggregate results. We examine...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005332317
The data in Fehr and Tyran (FT, 2001) and Luba Petersen and Abel Winn (PW,2013) show that money illusion plays an important role in nominal price adjustment after a fully anticipated negative monetary shock. Money Illusion affects subjects' expectations, and causes pronounced nominal inertia...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010815742
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006829607
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008222137
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007910061
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007021093