Showing 1 - 10 of 67
Scholarship on competition policy has begun to explore the implications of learning from behavioral research and to challenge the assumption of profit maximization at the heart of neoclassical economic theory of the firm. This scholarship is briefly reviewed, focusing on merger control....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008836327
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008846918
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005132762
This paper analyzes the effects of mergers between firms competing by simultaneously choosing price and location. Products combined by a merger are repositioned away from each other to reduce cannibalization, and non-merging substitutes are, in response, repositioned between the merged products....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005139927
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005499677
In this paper, we study mergers in oral or second-price auctions and compare them to mergers in sealed-bid or first-price auctions. We use an adaptation of the logit qualitative choice model to characterize the underlying bidder value distributions. In second-price auctions, this model has a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005437909
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005192724
We are given a lot of tools, but no warning label on how or when to employ them. Michael Doane (Competition Economics, LLC), Luke Froeb & Steven Tschantz (Vanderbilt University)
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008683540
We analyze the bias from predicting merger effects using structural models of price competition when firms actually compete using both price and promotion. We extend the standard merger simulation framework to allow for competition over both price and promotion and ask what happens if we ignore...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008871666
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005705016