Showing 1 - 7 of 7
)诉乌拉圭案中,仲裁庭驳回了菲莫关于乌拉圭的反吸烟立法侵占了烟草公司商标的主张。仲裁庭在裁判说理中,大体上遵从了乌拉圭为减少烟草公司的经营活动以增强公共卫生的政策决定。菲利普·莫里斯诉乌拉圭案提出了这样一个问题,即除了公共卫生之外,法庭还应考虑其他一些公共政策考虑因素,例如促进外国投资和保护知识产权。本文探讨了“公共政策”的概念,以及与知识产权相关的投资仲裁法律制度也即知识产权法、世界贸易组织法以及国际投资法是如何处理公共政策方面的问题的。本文还回顾了与知识产权相关的投资仲裁案件例如菲利普-莫里斯诉乌拉圭(Philip Morris v. Uruguay)、礼来公司诉加拿大(Eli Lilly v. Canada)以及普利司通诉巴拿马(Bridgestone v. Panama)案件之中的公共政策考量。 … Philip Morris v. Uruguay and Eli Lilly v. Canada, as well as Bridgestone v. Panama …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013219089
This paper extends the results obtained by Hwang et al. (1997) and Yang (2005) to the case of multi-domestic firms. Either the domestic government's budget constraint may be binding or there exists the social cost which caused by financing the export subsidy, we find that the policy of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008555979
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012956149
Exchange rate movements affect exports through depreciation (appreciation) and risk. Depreciation may raise exports but exchange rate risk could offset the positive effect. This paper investigates the net effect for eight Asian countries using a dynamic conditional correlation bivariate GARCH-M...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008555966
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001597033
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000966117
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001417867