We examine whether public disclosure of Deloitte 2007 PCAOB Part II report, which identifies quality control deficiencies related to audits of income tax accounts, affects Deloitte's auditor-provided tax services (APTS). Using a difference-in-differences model, we document a 17 percent lower...

Following the severe liquidity and credit problems that companies faced during the financial crisis of 2007-2008, there is heightened interest in reasons why auditors might not issue going-concern opinions (GCOs) to financially distressed clients who seem to warrant such opinions. We examine...

This study identifies auditors who have 100% market shares in a city-industry audit market (hereinafter, monopolist auditors) and examines their pricing strategy. I document that monopolist auditors charge lower fees than do industry specialist auditors. This result is consistent with a...

This study examines whether auditors use their own going-concern opinion (GCO) errors (i.e., endogenous, results-based audit-quality signals) as audit-quality signals, and whether they use those signals to make adjustments in their subsequent office-wide audit quality. We argue (along with the...

This study investigates the combination of textual and numerical accounting disclosures, which are often examined in silos by prior research. Focusing on three inherently complicated footnotes, we capture the amount of text used to explain numbers with the ratio of words to numbers. Using...

PCAOB inspections repeatedly indicate deficiencies in audits of FV estimates, resulting in efforts by regulators to improve the related guidance and auditing standards (PCAOB 2017a). Nevertheless, regulators cannot fully resolve the complexity and inherent subjectivity in auditing fair value...