Showing 1 - 10 of 62
Using detailed admissions data made public in the SFFA v. Harvard and SFFA v. UNC cases, we examine how racial preferences for under-represented minorities (URMs) affect their admissions to Harvard and UNC-Chapel Hill. At Harvard, the admit rates for typical African American applicants are on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013187164
Detecting racial discrimination using observational data is challenging because of the presence of unobservables that may be correlated with race. Using data made public in the SFFA v. Harvard case, we estimate discrimination in a setting where this concern is mitigated. Namely, we show that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012203195
, legacies, those on the dean's interest list, and children of faculty and staff (ALDCs). Among white admits, over 43% are ALDC …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012118873
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013279384
Using detailed admissions data made public in the SFFA v. Harvard and SFFA v. UNC cases, we examine how racial preferences for under-represented minorities (URMs) affect their admissions to Harvard and UNC-Chapel Hill. At Harvard, the admit rates for typical African American applicants are on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013191059
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013348871
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003835770
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003993001
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009559436
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009746296