Showing 1 - 5 of 5
Recent research shows that journal reviewing practices are neither objective nor fair. I propose a procedure to increase the likelihood of publishing important papers. This will be tested by Interfaces for a year.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005556509
Intentional Changes is an important book. It suggests different approaches to the way in which we try to implement change. It provides, as do most important books, much that you will disagree with. Tough’s conclusions are based on studies that are likely to be unknown to you. The book is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005408084
As Cicchetti indicates, agreement among reviewers is not high. This conclusion is empirically supported by Fiske and Fogg (1990), who reported that two independent reviews of the same papers typically had no critical point in common. Does this imply that journal editors should strive for a high...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005408086
. This review gives a description of the content of Dillman’s book. It goes on to describe the flaws not only to alert the …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005119369
Q. What do you have when you have a lawyer up to his neck in sand? A. Not enough sand.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005119418