Showing 1 - 7 of 7
Using a simple model with two levels of skill, we assume that high-skill workers who fail to get high-skill jobs may accept low-skill positions; low-skill workers do not have the analogous option of filling high-skill positions. This asymmetry implies that an adverse, skill-neutral shock to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005130379
Using a simple model with two levels of skill, we assume that high-skill workers who fail to get high-skill jobs may accept low-skill positions; low-skill workers do not have the analogous option of filling high-skill positions. This asymmetry implies that an adverse, skill-neutral shock to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010456983
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006800187
Using a simple model with two levels of skill, we assume that high-skill workers who fail to get high-skill jobs may accept low-skill positions; low-skill workers do not have the analogous option of filling high-skill positions. This asymmetry implies that a slowdown in Hicks-neutral technical...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014138675
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010652198
Using a simple model with two levels of skill, we assume that high-skill workers who fail to get high-skill jobs may accept low-skill positions; low-skill workers so not have the analogous option of filling high-skill positions. This asymmetry implies that an adverse, skill-neutral shock to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011071601
Using a simple model with two levels of skill, we assume that high-skill workers who fail to get high-skill jobs may accept low-skill positions; low-skill workers do not have the analogous option of filling high-skill positions. This asymmetry implies that a slowdown in Hicks-neutral technical...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005439921