Showing 1 - 10 of 171
This paper investigates the implications of U.S. withdrawal on environmental effectiveness, economic efficiency, and the distribution of compliance costs taking into account market power of the Former Soviet Union (FSU) on emission permit markets. While exercise of market power on behalf of FSU...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011446922
We show that U.S. withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol is straightforward under political economy considerations. The reason is that U.S. compliance costs exceed low willingness to pay for dealing with global warming in the U.S. The withdrawal had a crucial impact on the concretion of the Protocol...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011447299
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001760661
We show that U.S. withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol is straightforward under political economy considerations. The reason is that U.S. compliance costs exceed low willingness to pay for dealing with global warming in the U.S. The withdrawal had a crucial impact on the concretion of the Protocol...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001666884
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002208054
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003898897
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008696756
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003920292
Carbon leakage provides an efficiency argument for unilateral climate policy to differentiate emission prices in favor of emission-intensive and trade-exposed sectors. At the same time, differential emission pricing can be (mis-)used as a beggar-thy-neighbor policy to exploit terms of trade....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009697874
Concerns about adverse impacts on domestic energy-intensive and trade-exposed (EITE) industries are at the fore of the political debate about unilateral climate policies. Tariffs on the carbon embodied in imported goods from countries without emission pricing appeal as a measure to reduce carbon...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010252654