Showing 1 - 10 of 11
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012177108
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011781839
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011857172
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003781741
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014500248
The paper defines a consensus distribution with respect to experts’ opinions by a multiple quantile utility model. The paper points out that the Steiner Point is the representative consensus probability. The new rule of experts’ opinions aggregation, that can be evaluated by the Shapley...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010760436
The paper defines a consensus distribution with respect to experts’ opinions by a multiple quantile utility model. The paper points out that the Steiner Point is the representative consensus probability. The new rule of experts’ opinions aggregation, that can be evaluated by the Shapley...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010891093
The paper investigates a decision-making process involving both risk and ambiguity. Differently from existing papers [Basili, M., Chateauneuf, A., Fontini, F., 2005. Choices under ambiguity with familiar and unfamiliar outcomes, Theory and Decision 58, 195-207; Chichilnisky, G., 2000. Axiomatic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005358832
This paper considers a decision-making process under ambiguity in which the decision-maker is supposed to split outcomes between familiar and unfamiliar ones. She is assumed to behave differently with respect to unfamiliar gains, unfamiliar losses and customary (familiar) outcomes. In...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005709936
This paper considers a decision-making process under ambiguity in which the decision-maker is supposed to split outcomes between familiar and unfamiliar ones. She is assumed to behave differently with respect to unfamiliar gains, unfamiliar losses and customary (familiar) outcomes. In...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005670969