Showing 1 - 6 of 6
<p><p><p><p><p><p>In this research, funded by the Nuffield Foundation, we merge detailed household level expenditure data from older households with historical local weather information. We then test for a heat or eat trade off: do households cut back on food spending to finance the additional cost of keeping...</p></p></p></p></p></p>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009132494
<p><p>Standard economic theory implies that the labelling of cash transfers or cash-equivalents (e.g. child benefits, food stamps) should have no effect on spending patterns. The empirical literature to date does not contradict this proposition. We study the UK Winter Fuel Payment (WFP), a cash...</p></p>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009132495
We merge detailed household level expenditure data from older households with historical local weather information. We then test for a heat or eat trade off: do households cut back on food spending to finance the additional cost of keeping warm during cold shocks? For households who cannot...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009368411
Standard economic theory implies that the labelling of cash transfers or cash-equivalents (e.g. child benefits, food stamps) should have no effect on spending patterns. The empirical literature to date does not contradict this proposition. We study the UK Winter Fuel Payment (WFP), a cash...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010550957
Government transfers to individuals are often given labels indicating that they are designed to support the consumption of particular goods. Standard economic theory implies that the labeling of cash transfers or cash-equivalents should have no effect on spending patterns. We study the UK Winter...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010931418
Paper removed by author 10/14/10. An updated version will be posted soon.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005014784