Showing 1 - 10 of 25
We provide empirical evidence on how the practice of competitive benchmarking affects chief executive officer (CEO) pay. We find that the use of benchmarking is widespread and has a significant impact on CEO compensation. One view is that benchmarking is inefficient because it can lead to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005477925
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005204123
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003812749
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003335747
We provide empirical evidence on how the practice of competitive benchmarking affects CEO pay. We find that the use of benchmarking is widespread, and has a significant impact on levels and changes in CEO compensation. The practice is controversial and one view is that it is inefficient because...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012710498
We test theories of managerial entrenchment and ability matching by examining the relation between CEO turnover and the level of firm diversification. Our results indicate that CEO turnover in diversified firms is completely insensitive to firm performance. Additional analysis indicates that for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012710546
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007259523
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008899786
We provide empirical evidence on how the practice of competitive benchmarking affects CEO pay. We find that the use of benchmarking is widespread, and has a significant impact on levels and changes in CEO compensation. The practice is controversial and one view is that it is inefficient because...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012751797
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008141091