Showing 1 - 10 of 13
This study details the location patterns of R&D labs in the U.S., but it differs from past studies in a number of ways. First, rather than looking at the geographic concentration of manufacturing firms (e.g., Ellison and Glaeser, 1997; Rosenthal and Strange, 2001; and Duranton and Overman, 2005), the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004976677
This working paper supersedes WP 12-22, WP 11-42, and WP 10-33. We employ a unique data set to examine the spatial clustering of private R&D labs, and, using patent citations data, we provide evidence of localized knowledge spillovers within these clusters. Jaffe, Trajtenberg, and Henderson...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011133767
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003784458
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003874152
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010502815
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010392181
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011688993
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011689383
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011845054
SUPERCEDES EORKING PAPER 17-32 Buzard et al. (2017) show that American R&D labs are highly spatially concentrated even within a given metropolitan area. We argue that the geography of their clusters is better suited for studying knowledge spillovers than are states, metropolitan areas, or other...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012197762