Showing 1 - 6 of 6
We analyze how wage setting institutions and job-security provisions interact on unemployment. The assumption that wages are renegotiated by mutual agreement only is introduced in a matching model with endogenous job destruction – la Mortensen and Pissarides (1994) in order to get wage...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010262316
It is frequently argued that pure government-mandated severance transfers by the employer to the worker have neither employment nor welfare effect because they can be offset by private transfers from the worker to the employer. In this paper, using a dynamic search and matching model a la...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010262317
high redundancy transfers influence employment. Moreover, the assumption of renegotiation by mutual agreement allows us to …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005762387
It is frequently argued that pure government-mandated severance transfers by the employer to the worker have neither employment nor welfare effect because they can be offset by private transfers from the worker to the employer. In this paper, using a dynamic search and matching model à la...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005703431
We analyze how wage setting institutions and job-security provisions interact on unemployment. The assumption that wages are renegotiated by mutual agreement only is introduced in a matching model with endogenous job destruction - la Mortensen and Pissarides (1994) in order to get wage profiles...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011318147
It is frequently argued that pure government-mandated severance transfers by the employer to the worker have neither employment nor welfare effect because they can be offset by private transfers from the worker to the employer. In this paper, using a dynamic search and matching model a la...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011318608