Showing 1 - 10 of 48
This paper investigates whether specialization in research is causing economics to become an increasingly fragmented and diverse discipline with a continually rising number of niche-based research programs and a declining role for dominant cross-science research programs. It opens by framing the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014110850
The paper first discusses the methodological problem of identifying change in economics, given that change is always present in any discipline. It rejects ‘inventory’ methods that subjectively compare ‘new’ and ‘old’ concepts, and argues we should focus on economics’ disciplinary...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014081920
Economics imperialism is broadly explained as economics having an impact on other disciplines. But how should economics imperialism be understood when it is in some sense the product of other disciplines having an impact on economics? The paper examines psychology’s impact on economics in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014165257
This chapter applies social identity analysis to social capital theory in order to explain trust and conflict in social networks. It reformulates Putnam’s bridging-bonding social capital distinction in terms of the relational social identities-categorical social identities distinction, and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014151107
This short comment on Mark White's comment on the relationship of economics and ethics focuses on the nature of economics and ethics as an emergent field of investigation. It discusses different types of between-discipline fields, and compares crossdisciplinary and transdisciplinary...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012910931
This paper extends behavioral economics' realist methodological critique of rational choice theory to include the type of logical reasoning underlying its axiomatic foundations. A purely realist critique ignores Kahneman's emphasis on how the theory's axiomatic foundations make it normative. I...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012912593
This paper reviews the debate in economics over neuroeconomics' contribution to economics. It distinguishes majority and minority views, argues that this debate has been framed by mainstream economics' conception of itself as an isolated science, and argues that this framing has put off the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012993779
This paper uses a core-periphery distinction to characterize contemporary economics, economic methodology, and also today’s world economy. First, it applies the distinction to the organization of contemporary economics through an examination of the problem of explaining economics’ relations...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014108517
This short paper discusses majority and minority views in economics regarding the value of neuroscience for economics – and thus the value of the neuroeconomics research program. It argues that neuroeconomics’ reception ultimately depends on whether economists adopt a philosophy of science...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014150840
This chapter examines the nature of ethics and economics as a single subject of investigation, and uses a complex systems approach to characterize the nature of that subject. It then distinguishes mainstream economic and social economic visions of it, where the former assumes that market...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014114234