Showing 1 - 10 of 100
Competing firms often have the possibility to jointly determine the magnitude of consumers' switching costs. Examples include compatibility decisions and the option of introducing number portability in telecom and banking. We put forward a model where firms jointly decide to reduce switching...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010264477
Competing firms often have the possibility to jointly determine the magnitude of consumers' switching costs. Examples include compatibility decisions and the option of introducing number portability in telecom and banking. We put forward a model where firms jointly decide to reduce switching...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003790579
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003996127
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009241039
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003630689
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003777785
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003728497
Competing firms often have the possibility to jointly determine the magnitude of consumers' switching costs. Examples include compatibility decisions and the option of introducing number portability in telecom and banking. We put forward a model where firms jointly decide to reduce switching...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012769346
Competition authorities and regulatory agencies sometimes impose pricing restrictions on firms with substantial market power - the dominant firms. We analyze the welfare effects of a ban on behaviour-based price discrimination in a two-period setting where the market displays a competitive and a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013316614
Competing firms often have the possibility to jointly determine the magnitude of consumers’ switching costs. Examples include compatibility decisions and the option of introducing number portability in telecom and banking. We put forward a model where firms jointly decide to reduce switching...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005181346