Showing 1 - 10 of 14
Credence goods markets suffer from inefficiencies arising from informational asymmetries between expert sellers and customers. While standard theory predicts that inefficiencies disappear if customers can verify the quality received, verifiability fails to yield efficiency in experiments with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003931304
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003478594
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008657628
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009571158
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009552490
In markets for credence goods sellers are better informed than their customers about the quality that yields the highest surplus from trade. This paper studies second-degree price-discrimination in such markets. It shows that discrimination regards the amount of advice offered to customers and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010354736
Credence goods markets suffer from inefficiencies caused by superior information of sellers about the surplus-maximizing quality. While standard theory predicts that equal mark-up prices solve the credence goods problem if customers can verify the quality received, experimental evidence...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010479932
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001526723
Evidence on behavior of experts in credence goods markets raises an important causality issue: Do "fair prices" induce "good behavior", or do "good experts" post "fair prices"? To answer this question we propose and test a model with three seller types: "the good" choose fair prices and behave...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009536497
Evidence on behavior of experts in credence goods markets raises an important causality issue: Do "fair prices" induce "good behavior", or do "good experts" post "fair prices"? To answer this question we propose and test a model with three seller types: "the good" choose fair prices and behave...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013107208