Showing 1 - 10 of 15
This paper aims to extend the results by Ross (1981) [15] and by Modica and Scarsini (2005) [13] to stochastic dominance of degree 4 and over. Specifically, it is shown that Ross' approach can be extended to any order of risk attitude beyond the generalization proposed by Modica and Scarsini by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008860974
Many results involving expected utility theory call upon the notions of absolute risk aversion, prudence, and/or temperance. This paper exploits a representation of the Friedman-Savage utility premium (Friedman, M., L. J. Savage. 1948. The utility analysis of choices involving risk. J. Political...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009214205
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010696754
At first glance, there would appear to be no relationship between Bell’s (1988) concept of one-switch utility functions and that of a stronger measure of risk aversion due to Ross (1981). We show however that specific assumptions about the behavior of the stronger measure of risk aversion also...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010662576
In this letter, we show that the results presented by Jindapon and Neilson (2007) for changes in risk à la Ekern (1980) can be generalized to mean-preserving stochastic dominance changes, with appropriate and simple additional conditions on the utility function.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011041839
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010168478
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010083465
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010091847
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008770803
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008447742