Showing 1 - 10 of 17
We study the willingness to pay for reductions in health risks when people do not evaluate probabilities linearly, as is commonly assumed in elicitations of willingness to pay, but weight probabilities, as is commonly observed in empirical studies of decision under risk. We show that for the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005442787
In this note we use the rank-dependent utility (RDU) model to analyze saving decisions. The RDU model enables us to separate the effects of pessimism and optimism on saving from that of concavity of the utility function. While pessimism induces more saving, the importance of this effect is shown...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005371177
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005374769
Many health risks are ambiguous in the sense that reliable and credible information about these risks is unavailable. In health economics, ambiguity is usually handled through sensitivity analysis, which implicitly assumes that people are neutral towards ambiguity. However, empirical evidence...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011051306
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006871521
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006649596
We provide a new test of the feasibility of using contingent valuation to value informal care. We start with a theoretical model of informal caregiving and derive that willingness to pay depends positively on wealth and negatively on own health, whereas the effect of other's health is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005690029
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005306773
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005239364
Traditionally aversion to health inequality is modelled through a concave utility function over health outcomes. Bleichrodt et al. [Bleichrodt, H., Diecidue E., Quiggin J., 2004. Equity weights in the allocation of health care: the rank-dependent QALY model. Journal of Health Economics 23,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005204348