Showing 1 - 10 of 54
because they are excessively selfish. Finally those who receive better marks at prison school give more, as do those who …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010270634
because they are excessively selfish. Finally those who receive better marks at prison school give more, as do those who …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008574249
because they are excessively selfish. Finally those who receive better marks at prison school give more, as do those who … improve their marks over time. This suggests that this correctional intervention also reduces selfishness. -- Crime ; Prison …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003980334
For a rational choice theorist, the absence of crime is more difficult to explain than its presence. Arguably, the expected value of criminal sanctions, i.e. the product of severity times certainty, is often below the expected benefit. We rely on a standard theory from behavioral economics,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009723560
For a rational choice theorist, the absence of crime is more difficult to explain than its presence. Arguably, the expected value of criminal sanctions, i.e. the product of severity times certainty, is often below the expected benefit. We rely on a standard theory from behavioral economics,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013084563
Criminal procedure is organized as a tournament with predefined roles. We show that assuming the role of a defense counsel or prosecutor leads to role induced bias even if participants are asked to predict a court ruling after they have ceased to act in that role, and if they expect a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008693527
Legal realists expect prosecutors to be selfish. If they get the defendant convicted, this helps them advance their careers. If the odds of winning on the main charge are low, prosecutors have a second option. They can exploit the ambiguity of legal doctrine and charge the defendant for vaguely...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009226923
Punishees regularly ask for justification. But is justification also effective? To answer this question under controlled conditions, we have conducted a public goods experiment with central punishment. The authority is neutral – she does not benefit from contributions to the public good....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010731963
Sanctions are often so weak that a money maximizing individual would not be deterred. In this paper I show that they may nonetheless serve a forward looking purpose if sufficiently many individuals are averse against advantageous inequity. Using the Fehr/Schmidt model (QJE 1999) I define three...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010667903
For a rational choice theorist, the absence of crime is more difficult to explain than its presence. Arguably, the expected value of criminal sanctions, i.e. the product of severity times certainty, is often below the expected benefit. We rely on a standard theory from behavioral economics,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010667907